Interesting Observations on AI-Generated Posts
This article was translated by AI (LLM). There may be errors or inaccuracies. For the original content, please refer to the original version.
Recently, I’ve been writing feature announcement posts for Klavis-AI across various social platforms
We prepared a carefully crafted technical blog that everyone agreed on, then asked AI to generate platform-specific versions
After reviewing, we discovered striking quality differences:
- Hacker News: Matched the open-source focused style, but with exaggerated, floating tone
- LinkedIn: Completely missed the “business” style, wrote purely from open-source/technical perspective
- Reddit: Felt like an actual Reddit post, but even non-native speakers could tell it was AI-generated
- Twitter/X: Perfect
- V2EX: Nailed it
- Discord: Worked fine from closed community perspective
Attempting to Summarize Reasons
Clearly, AI writing quality depends heavily on how open the social platform is.
This leads to:
Open platforms: AI thrives, but so do humans - community quality declines.
Closed platforms: Limits AI presence, but also limits human engagement - community stagnates.