Interesting Observations on AI-Generated Posts
This article was translated by AI (LLM). There may be errors or inaccuracies. For the original content, please refer to the original version。
Recently, I’ve been writing posts announcing new features for Klavis-AI across various social platforms
We prepared a carefully crafted technical blog that everyone agreed on, then asked AI to write platform-specific posts in different styles
After reviewing them, we discovered astonishing quality differences:
- Hacker News: Matched the open-source focused style, but the tone was overly flashy and prone to exaggeration
- LinkedIn: Completely mismatched its “business” style, written purely from an open-source/technical perspective
- Reddit: Felt like reading an actual Reddit post, but even non-native English speakers could tell it was AI-generated
- Twitter/X: Perfect
- V2EX: Hit the mark
- Discord: Perfectly fine from a closed community perspective
Attempting to Summarize the Reasons
Clearly, how well AI writes depends on how open the social platform is.
So it essentially boils down to:
Open platforms: AI thrives, but so do people - at the cost of declining community quality.
Closed platforms: Limit AI presence, but also limit human participation - leading to community stagnation.